Why I am Supporting David Kunkle for Mayor and Yes, It Has To Do With His House
Share News:
I posted the homes of the top three mayoral candidates– apologies to Ed Okpa, because he is not in the top third, maybe next election — because I thought it would be fun to look at what their homes say about their persona.
Then I discovered the “conditions”, or CDU of each candidate’s home — condition, desirability, utility. As I mentioned in the first post, all of these candidates live in homes built about the same time — Mike Rawlings home was remodeled in 2006, Ron Natinsky’s was built in 2003, so it’s the oldest, and David Kunkle’s home was built in 2006. Ron’s being the oldest is in the “worst” condition, that is, only a “good”, not “excellent”.
When do we want our homes to be in the worst possible shape? When we protest our property taxes. I saw all three homes — not one is in bad shape. Any one of these top candidate’s homes is ready for a photo shoot at the drop of a hat. The conditions of each candidate’s home is “good” for Natinsky, “very good” for Rawlings, and “excellent” for Kunkle. Why the variation on the conditions?
Because of property taxes, my favorite subject. I do it, you do it. You go down there and tell the appraisers how bad everything is in your home, all the repairs that have to be made and are in fact dragging down your property value. The appraiser lowers the condition of your home and that brings down your home value, saves you a smidgen in taxes. Would anyone want to sell their home and blast out the condition is merely good? Hell no. These are just the games we play because of the ridiculous property tax system in this state.
My house is just FALLING APART! My condition is “good”. But it could sure be better.
So what this tells me is that of these three candidates, Ron Natinsky has fought most vigorously to reduce his property taxes. Hmmm, maybe I should be voting for him.
Mike Rawlings fought pretty hard too, to get a condition of “very good” and in fact, I’d suggest he call Tiffany Hamill Mackey and let her get the condition knocked down to “good”, save him a few dollars.
David Kunkle has obviously not been aggressively fighting his taxes because his house is in the best condition — excellent, highest you can get. Hence my rationale.
This could mean that Kunkle, who is also not keen on increasing taxes, plays the game the most fairly. It tells me what I think about the man: he’s kind of a basically decent guy who’s going to do what’s right, not what saves him money or nets him a bigger tax savings. I like that. I’m also tired of politics being a personality contest. I like that he lowered crime when he was Chief of Police — our crime rate is inching upwards again, by the way. I think he spends money where it’s needed, not on fluff. I think Dallas is poised to become a world class city if we can cut the cronyism and petty politics and we need a mayor who does not use city resources to tend or mend his marital woes. I think Kunkle wants to make us healthier from within, rather than worrying about the impression our skyscape makes on visitors or postcards. Visitors don’t live here, we do. And we need to tend to our neighborhoods and quality of life. It’s a little like when Jayne Byrne won the mayor’s race in Chicago because of a series of wicked snowstorms. Byrne was fired by Daley machine mayor Michael Bilandic in 1977, then ran against him in 1979. Political observers poo-poohed she had any chance of winning. However, when Chicago was all but paralyzed by those January storms, Byrne got the edge she needed and won the general election with 72 percent of the vote–at the time, the largest margin ever recorded in a Chicago mayoral election.
Personally, I think we have three really great candidates, maybe the best we’ve ever had. It’s a hard choice, and in a perfect world I’d say let them share the job.
Or maybe we just need a few bad snowstorms to see who can shovel the best.
Good
Very Good
Excellent
10 Comments
Can I vote based on the house I like best? Rawlings has the least "McMansion-y" home, so he just jumped ahead of the others. Funny that his is appraised for 3 times more and it's the one that's not "trying to look expensive".
Can I vote based on the house I like best? Rawlings has the least "McMansion-y" home, so he just jumped ahead of the others. Funny that his is appraised for 3 times more and it's the one that's not "trying to look expensive".
Candy, having been away from Dallas I obviously do not know these three candidates. Thus, I could not tell you who would be the best candidate to vote for. But if we are deciding on who to vote for based on the style of their house (dubious rationale. . .think of Batman and his Batcave, looks terrible on the outside, but boy is it happening on the inside) I would have to go with the third house which you ranked as excellent.
The first house that was ranked good was built by "Berry Bonds." Yes the same Berry Bonds who was recently accused of using steroids. The house screams "look at me". . ."look at all my oversized appendages." As for voting for the owner for Mayor? Who knows maybe he too would set records knocking the ball out of the park, time-after-time, but there also might be a few astricks after the record.
The second house, I'm sorry, looks like a fancy strip center where I would go for my prostate exam. Felt like I was looking for "Suite 105," kept expecting to see the personalized license plate of the Dr in the parking lot and it says "Assman." How would he be as mayor? This is the hard one to peg. . .maybe his wife wanted the house. . .maybe no one wanted the house and the price was severly discounted. . .maybe, maybe, maybe. . .as in "maybe he would be a good mayor?"
The third house, which I would describe as a classic cottage, now this is the guy I would vote for. Not because you rated it as "excellent," but because of the three houses it tells me that the owner is unassuming, works hard for what he wants. That he is a "classic" guy who will stand the tests of time. However, before I voted for him I would want to get my ladder out and check out his dead valley, if he doesn't keep it clean, then rain won't run off his roof cleanly, it will back up, getting under his shingles, rotting the rafters and joists underneath the shingles. Trust me. . .that is not a good metaphor for any city. . .especially the city I love.
Good luck with your election, and remember vote early, and vote often.
Candy, having been away from Dallas I obviously do not know these three candidates. Thus, I could not tell you who would be the best candidate to vote for. But if we are deciding on who to vote for based on the style of their house (dubious rationale. . .think of Batman and his Batcave, looks terrible on the outside, but boy is it happening on the inside) I would have to go with the third house which you ranked as excellent.
The first house that was ranked good was built by "Berry Bonds." Yes the same Berry Bonds who was recently accused of using steroids. The house screams "look at me". . ."look at all my oversized appendages." As for voting for the owner for Mayor? Who knows maybe he too would set records knocking the ball out of the park, time-after-time, but there also might be a few astricks after the record.
The second house, I'm sorry, looks like a fancy strip center where I would go for my prostate exam. Felt like I was looking for "Suite 105," kept expecting to see the personalized license plate of the Dr in the parking lot and it says "Assman." How would he be as mayor? This is the hard one to peg. . .maybe his wife wanted the house. . .maybe no one wanted the house and the price was severly discounted. . .maybe, maybe, maybe. . .as in "maybe he would be a good mayor?"
The third house, which I would describe as a classic cottage, now this is the guy I would vote for. Not because you rated it as "excellent," but because of the three houses it tells me that the owner is unassuming, works hard for what he wants. That he is a "classic" guy who will stand the tests of time. However, before I voted for him I would want to get my ladder out and check out his dead valley, if he doesn't keep it clean, then rain won't run off his roof cleanly, it will back up, getting under his shingles, rotting the rafters and joists underneath the shingles. Trust me. . .that is not a good metaphor for any city. . .especially the city I love.
Good luck with your election, and remember vote early, and vote often.
A nice little "cottage", I agree! If I lived in Dallas, I would support him! (plus we are friends on Facebook, hehe)
A nice little "cottage", I agree! If I lived in Dallas, I would support him! (plus we are friends on Facebook, hehe)
Robert I think you deserve a prize for the best comment of the year! Thanks!
I'm serious about his dead valley, check it out first before you vote.
Robert I think you deserve a prize for the best comment of the year! Thanks!
I'm serious about his dead valley, check it out first before you vote.